I take notes during Town Meeting. They are not official in any way. As I listen to people speak, I type notes. I’m sure that, at times, I mishear or misunderstand the speaker, but my notes represent what I hear at the time. I then publish the notes every night after the meeting. I do go back and make a few edits as errors are pointed out to me.
I do not try to reproduce my entire notes for this online version. Sometimes I relay a quote from a specific speaker. Most of the time I only summarize the discussion. At points I give a purely personal opinion; those are clearly labeled like this:Â Personal note.
Town Meeting Member Charlie Gallagher led the Town Meeting in the national anthem.
Moderator John Leone said that he was taking his jacket off because of the heat. I had already taken my jacket and tie off – Town Hall is not a cool room! I resisted changing to shorts.
Moderator John Leone said that we could be done tonight if we finished.
We voted to return Monday 13th if we don’t finish tonight. Thankfully, this vote was rendered moot.
There was a presentation made to Harry McCabe and Elsie Fiore in recognition of their 50 years of membership in Town Meeting.
Clarissa Rowe and Cindy Starks thanked the town for their vote in the override.
Sheri Baron gave the Human Rights Commission report.
Article 7 – Cemetery Use in Open Space
David Bean moved reconsideration of the article. He said there were scheduling issues with the original date and wanted to explain the article. Paul Schlictman opposed reconsideration because he thinks the original idea is still flawed and needs to be revised. Reconsideration failed 68-73 (required 2/3 – wasn’t even close). I waffled on this one. Part of me wanted to hear the issue, but part of me knew that the article had no chance without further revision.
Article 31 GIC
No action, approved by voice vote.
Article 34 Pay As You Throw
Clarissa Rowe gave the recommendation of Board of Selectmen of no action. Pete Howard had a resolution as a substitute motion. He requested extra time for a longer presentation; the request was denied by voice vote. The vote wasn’t even close. It was a sign that town meeting wanted to finish, and was a bit impatient. Howard and others gave a presentation about how PAYT would be implemented. They provided the framework of how the costs of the program might be implemented. Patricia Worden spoke against the plan. A speaker spoke against some of the details of the framework on the basis of pennies per pound. This was very disheartening, and really speaks to why I didn’t want this debate tonight. The proposal was a loose resolution, and it didn’t have unified support of the town’s leadership. The result was predictable – a debate without a common framework, without common facts, that simply wasn’t productive. Half of the arguments were made against strawmen that simply weren’t a part of the proposal, but couldn’t be meaningfully debated because there was no firm proposal to compare it to. Mr. Worden spoke against. He offered an amendment to the resolution to make it include a vote of the town. Several speakers were in favor and against the resolution. I spoke against it. Al Tosti reported that Finance Committee thinks that a revenue-producing PAYT needs a vote of the town. Carl Wagner moved to terminate debate. Worden’s amendment approved by voice. Howard’s motion down by voice vote. No action on the article was approved. This issue was a tough one for me, and the debate was torture. As I said in my speech, I think that PAYT is a good idea. The challenge is that people are very passionate about it, both for and against, and we need to be delicate, careful, and deliberate in how we get PAYT done. Furthermore, I don’t think we can implement PAYT as a revenue source during the 3-year plan that we just kicked off with the override. However, I think we can do it in a revenue-neutral way. I’m committed to working on that over the next year. I just wish we could have skipped this whole painful debate. The result was predicted, and it just hurt.
Article 35. No action.
Article 54. Collective Bargaining.
Town Manager Brian Sullivan reported on the agreements for FY10 and FY11 that had been reached. He outlined the terms of the deal. Al Tosti reported the strong endorsement of the agreements of the Finance Committee. Terminated debate. Question on the language of the article from Harry McCabe. Approved by voice vote.
We took a 10 minute break.
Article 56. Budgets.
We had “holds” for discussion on the Selectmen budget, Town Manager, Personnel, Planning, Public Works, Community Safety, Education, Libraries, Health and Human Services, Insurance, and Water and Sewer.
Selectmen question on elections – yes, they are budgeted. There was discussion about the deputy town manager. There was an explanation that the Personnel budget is increasing so as to handle the anticipated plan design changes. Question on where computers are purchased – from capital, not from this budget. There was a question about changing the assistant planning director position to an economic development position. Planning Director Carol Kowalski explained that this will expand business opportunities in the town. There was a question about why the Conservation Commission budget was in Planning. Question on the amount of salt used. Question on adding weekly recycling – maybe during next negotiation. Paul Schlictman with questions about parking. He also had a question about fire staffing – “Do we need these add backs, since some firefighters on the Arlington email list don’t think we need them?” Chief Jefferson said they were needed. Question about patrolman v. ranking officers – more of the former, fewer of the latter. Questions on number of firefighters – 76 next year. Question on police overtime – it’s higher, but reflects actual expenditure.
There were many schools questions. Question on traffic supervisors – same number in FY12 as FY11, which is 13. There was a long thread about  adding grant writers to get more grants. Questions about maintenance. Question on special education management. There was a question about last year’s budget problems, and budget controls. The first answer out of the CFO’s mouth was “It’s not an overrun in spending, we just didn’t have enough revenue.” It was a frustratingly tone-deaf answer. I know that it’s frustrating to keep coming back to the same problem, but it has to be done, and it has to be handled properly.  Thankfully the second half of her answer was much better – she talked about the systems changes that have been implemented to make sure the budget problems don’t recur. There was a question on Thompson. Lyman Judd asked questions that were answered in the budget book. Paul Bayer moved the question on education.
Libraries question was asked without a clear answer.
Gordon Jamieson passed on questions on Insurance and Water and Sewer. This was gracefully done – we were so close to getting done.
Budgets were approved.
There were two different motions to adjourn voted down. It’s so much better to stay a little late and not have to come back on Monday!
Article 68 – OPEB
Charlie Foskett walked through the OPEB partial payment and how it’s funded. Substitute motion from Al Tosti made. Passed on voice vote unanimously.
Article 69 – COLA Base
Charlie Foskett explained how this vote would be an increase in the amount of salary that gets a COLA increase. The COLA now applies to the first $12,000 of salary; this would include an increase of $1000 in the base per year for three years. He explained that this is part of a complex deal with FinComm, Retirement Board, and the Town Manager. Motion substituted by voice vote, approved by voice vote unanimously.
Article 75 – Override Stabilization Fund
Tosti made a substitute motion. There was a question on how to protect this from losses like the last override savings, which was answered by Treasurer Stephen Gilligan. Approved.
On motion by Al Tosti, the meeting was dissolved.