{"id":169,"date":"2007-02-25T19:48:42","date_gmt":"2007-02-25T23:48:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/archives\/169"},"modified":"2007-04-21T11:46:44","modified_gmt":"2007-04-21T15:46:44","slug":"widmer-reminds-us-who-pays-his-bills","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/2007\/02\/widmer-reminds-us-who-pays-his-bills\/","title":{"rendered":"Widmer Reminds Us Who Pays His Bills"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Whenever there is a question about taxes in Massachussetts, Michael Widmer is never far from a microphone.  He is a fixture in press releases and news articles.<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s particularly popular when there is talk about the personal income tax: he predicts doom and gloom if the voter-enacted income tax decrease to 5% is ever implemented. His quotes provide cover for every legislator who is unable to make hard choices in government spending.    He <a href=\"http:\/\/www3.whdh.com\/news\/articles\/local\/BO42334\/\">advocates highway tolls<\/a>.  He likes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/local\/articles\/2007\/02\/16\/patrick_aid_plan_gets_cool_reception\/\">local option taxes<\/a> &#8211; the ones paid by individuals, anyway.  You can find his quotes attached to everything from healthcare to transit projects.<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s entitled to his opinion, of course, and the press is entitled to quote him. The only thing that drives me crazy is when the press pretends that he&#8217;s an independant voice. His organization is called the &#8220;<font size=\"-1\">Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.&#8221;<\/font>  But which taxpayers exactly does he represent?  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/local\/articles\/2007\/02\/23\/patrick_plan_has_tax_break_for_homes\/\">Boston.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">Michael Widmer, president of the business-backed Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, was scathingly critical of Patrick&#8217;s plan.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The proposal provides limited property tax relief at a high cost to the Massachusetts economy,&#8221; said Widmer, adding that it would be economically destructive to ask corporations to take another $500 million hit on top of the $400 million they had to pay after the Romney administration closed other so-called loopholes and a $600 million increase in unemployment insurance taxes in 2004.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Cumulatively, you&#8217;re talking about $1.5 billion annually in additional taxes at a time when our economy is weak, 150,000 jobs below where we were in 2001,&#8221; said Widmer, whom the Legislature often turns to for budget analysis. &#8220;This adds significantly to the competitiveness disadvantage facing Massachusetts businesses.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">Please, never mistake Widmer as an &#8220;independant&#8221; voice.  His bills are paid by the businesses that pay state taxes.  Consider him through that lens.  When he says something, he&#8217;s saying it so that his constituency will have a lower tax bill.  When he advocates higher personal income tax, he does so because it makes it easier to keep corporate taxes low.  When he advocates local option taxes, he&#8217;s doing it to protect his bosses.  And when he wants to keep the tolls?  It&#8217;s because that&#8217;s a revenue source that doesn&#8217;t hurt his benefactors.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whenever there is a question about taxes in Massachussetts, Michael Widmer is never far from a microphone. He is a fixture in press releases and news articles. He&#8217;s particularly popular when there is talk about the personal income tax: he predicts doom and gloom if the voter-enacted income tax decrease to 5% is ever implemented. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-massachusetts","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}