{"id":732,"date":"2010-04-27T02:01:44","date_gmt":"2010-04-27T06:01:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/?p=732"},"modified":"2010-04-27T12:21:11","modified_gmt":"2010-04-27T16:21:11","slug":"town-meeting-10-session-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/2010\/04\/town-meeting-10-session-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Town Meeting ’10 Session 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

Out-of-town readers: Yeah, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Town Meeting time again. That means you get more Arlington information than any reasonable non-resident would want. \u00c2\u00a0I’ll see if this gets me in a writing groove and it turns me on some more non-Arlington writing, too.<\/em><\/p>\n

I take notes during Town Meeting. They are not official in any way. As I listen to people speak, I scribble notes. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m sure that, at times, I mishear or misunderstand the speaker, but my notes represent what I hear at the time. I then publish the notes every night after the meeting. I do go back and make a few edits as errors are pointed out to me.<\/p>\n

I do not try to reproduce my entire notepad for this online version. Sometimes I relay a quote from a specific speaker. Most of the time I only summarize the discussion. At points I give a purely personal opinion; those are clearly labeled like this:\u00c2\u00a0Personal note<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Town Meeting was called to order at 8:05PM. \u00c2\u00a0The Menotomy Minutemen (in Revolutionary War garb) led the meeting in the Star-Spangled Banner.<\/p>\n

Town Moderator John Leone announced that his plan was to have a single invocation at Town Meeting, not every night. \u00c2\u00a0Town Meeting Member Richard Phelps gave the invocation.<\/p>\n

Moderator Leone gave some remarks. \u00c2\u00a0He noted the importance of brevity. \u00c2\u00a0He has copies of Town Meeting Time<\/a> available for sale. \u00c2\u00a0There is an information session<\/a> on the “stretch code” tomorrow at 7pm. \u00c2\u00a0There are 6 vacancies in town meeting, in precincts 5, 6, 11, and 12 that are all available for appointment.<\/p>\n

Selectman Greeley and Sue Sheffler gave an introduction of our guests from our sister city in Japan and gave an overview of the schedule of events.<\/p>\n

The new and re-elected town meeting members were sworn in together. \u00c2\u00a0In the past, the new members were sworn in separately, and received a round of applause from their new colleagues. \u00c2\u00a0Even though it’s a small thing, I always thought it was emotionally powerful. \u00c2\u00a0As a new member, you feel welcome and special. \u00c2\u00a0It loses a little of the “specialness” when the swearing is done in one group. \u00c2\u00a0I hope that Leone returns to the two-group process in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n

We approved the rules of the meeting. We permit specific non-town meeting members who are members of committees, town employees, the press, etc. to sit in the “enclosure” aka the main meeting floor.\u00c2\u00a0 Most\u00c2\u00a0 non-members must sit in the gallery above the floor. \u00c2\u00a0We did a couple other minor items including noting that the meeting had been properly announced to the town and that we would reconvene on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

Article 2 – State of the Town Address<\/strong>. Chairman of the Board of Selectmen Diane Mahon gave the state of the town. \u00c2\u00a0She kept it brief, less than five minutes. \u00c2\u00a0She thanked retiring Town Clerk Corinne Rainville for her service. She touched on personal financial hardship and the town’s financial hardship. She encouraged further work on regional flood planning. \u00c2\u00a0She encouraged a “collaborative” approach on controlling health care costs. \u00c2\u00a0She talked about the town’s strengths.<\/p>\n

Article 3 – <\/strong>Announcements and resolutions and reports were heard. \u00c2\u00a0Dick Smith proposed a resolution endorsing “Stand Against Racism” that was endorsed. \u00c2\u00a0The Board of Selectmen’s\u00c2\u00a0report<\/a>, the Redevelopment Board’s report<\/a>, and the Finance Committee’s report <\/a>were accepted. \u00c2\u00a0FinComm Chair Al Tosti spoke for a couple minutes about the budget processes and challenges.<\/p>\n

Article 4<\/strong> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c John FitzMaurice was appointed Measurer of Wood and Bark.<\/p>\n

Article 5 <\/strong>– James O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122Conor of Precinct 19 and Bill Logan of Precinct 2 were nominated for Assistant Town Moderator. \u00c2\u00a0The election will be on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

Article 6 – Variance Application Review. <\/strong>Voted no action on Redevelopment Board recommendation.<\/p>\n

Article 7 – Bracket Signs. <\/strong>Planning Director Carol Kowalski explained that the proposed bylaw change would make it permissible for businesses in certain districts (East Arlington, the center, the Heights) to have signs that stick out perpendicularly from their buildings. \u00c2\u00a0It would make it easier for pedestrians to see the stores, especially on side streets. \u00c2\u00a0There were several questions about sign dimensions, possible town liability, grandfathering, and how they would look. \u00c2\u00a0One questioner suggested this change would be anti-business – that was a boggler<\/span>. \u00c2\u00a0The change was approved 162-21.<\/p>\n

Article 8 – Research and Development.<\/strong> This article is the first of several that would get Arlington designated as a “green community” and be eligible for state grants. \u00c2\u00a0This article would explicitly permit research and development of “green” industry in certain zones. \u00c2\u00a0After a question about fire protection, it passed 178-5.<\/p>\n

We took a 13 minute break. \u00c2\u00a0The short break was great! \u00c2\u00a0I hope we continue to be that disciplined.<\/span><\/p>\n

Article 9 – Land-based Solar Panels. <\/strong>State law already permits solar panels to be on roofs. \u00c2\u00a0This would permit them to be on the ground in industrial areas. \u00c2\u00a0The change was approved unanimously.<\/p>\n

Article 10 – Fencing Used as Screening. <\/strong>I’ll start by saying this was a botched presentation. \u00c2\u00a0The presentation of the article included written, verbal, and pictured descriptions of “property owners and abutters.” \u00c2\u00a0The obvious implication was that this was changing the regulation of fences between neighbors. \u00c2\u00a0 However, this was actually a change for something called a space buffer<\/a>: “6.16 \u00c2\u00a0Screening and space buffers shall be required in any industrial (I) or business (B) district which abuts\u00c2\u00a0certain buildable residential lots.” The ensuing debate was largely spent sorting through this confusion in some cases, and was never understood by many people in the meeting. Roland Chaput gave the presentation. <\/span>The proposed change would make it so the wall portion of those buffers could be more than a “solid” wall – it could be wood, iron, coated chain link, etc. if<\/em> the abutters and the building inspector agreed to it. \u00c2\u00a0Really, that’s a very narrow change when properly explained. \u00c2\u00a0I’m scrapping all my notes on the debate because they’re just confusing. Change approved, 142-10.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Article 11 – Illumination for Signs<\/strong>. \u00c2\u00a0Andrew West gave the presentation. \u00c2\u00a0The proposed change would make explicit that signs must be “interior lit” like a plastic sign with bulbs concealed inside it or directly lit, like a spotlight shining on the sign on the wall. \u00c2\u00a0Signs cannot be a “visible light source” like neon or LED. \u00c2\u00a0In the discussion it was explained that neon “open” signs inside the building are still permitted. \u00c2\u00a0Several speakers complained that if the intent was to regulate the lighting brightness, we should do so directly, and not try to tackle it through this indirect means. I had some sympathy for this argument, but my experience has been that trying to make technical regulations like that are also difficult. \u00c2\u00a0The noise ordinance debates of the past are examples. \u00c2\u00a0How and where you measure things and in what conditions makes it very difficult to write well.<\/span> It was said that marquee signs (like at theaters) would still be OK. \u00c2\u00a0This change was apparently driven by a LED sign at a gas station that the building inspector thought was legal, but the planning director did not, and this would clarify the rule. \u00c2\u00a0Leo Doherty was concerned that the Chamber of Commerce hadn’t had the opportunity to weigh in, and moved to postpone debate for a week, which failed on voice vote. \u00c2\u00a0The change was approved 116-32.<\/p>\n

Article 12 – Zoning Board of\u00c2\u00a0Adjustment\u00c2\u00a0Bylaws<\/strong>. Bruce Fitzsimmons gave the basics. \u00c2\u00a0The current board has 3 members, and a ruling requires all three to agree. \u00c2\u00a0The change would increase the board to 5 members, and a ruling would require 4 to agree. Clarissa Rowe explained that the Board of Selectmen wanted the change on the advice of the people they had interviewed for the position during recent vacancies. \u00c2\u00a0There were several questions about quorum and vote requirements. \u00c2\u00a0The change was approved 147-4.<\/p>\n

Someone who’s name I didn’t catch gave notice of reconsideration on article 12. \u00c2\u00a0Brian Rehrig gave notice on articles 9-12.<\/p>\n

The meeting was adjourned at 11pm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Out-of-town readers: Yeah, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Town Meeting time again. That means you get more Arlington information than any reasonable non-resident would want. \u00c2\u00a0I’ll see if this gets me in a writing groove and it turns me on some more non-Arlington writing, too. I take notes during Town Meeting. They are not official in any way. As […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arlington","category-town-meeting-10"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=732"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":738,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/732\/revisions\/738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dandunn.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}